Breaking Away from WHO: A Bold Move by US and Argentina
In a historic shift, the United States and Argentina have officially withdrawn from the World Health Organization (WHO), marking a significant departure from the global health body. This decision, announced recently, stems from deep-seated frustrations over the WHO's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and perceived lacks in transparency and accountability. U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Argentine Health Minister Mario Lugones signed a joint declaration on May 27, affirming their commitment to forge a new path in international health cooperation.
The move follows President Donald J. Trump's executive order in January 2025 to pull the U.S. out of the WHO, with Argentina echoing this stance on February 5 under President Javier Milei. Presidential spokesman Manuel Adorni cited 'profound differences' with the U.N. agency, particularly over pandemic management, as the driving force behind Argentina's exit. This coordinated withdrawal signals a rejection of what both nations view as systemic failures within the WHO.
Envisioning an Alternative International Health Framework
During a recent visit to Buenos Aires, Secretary Kennedy met with President Milei to discuss not just the withdrawal but the creation of what Kennedy described as an 'alternative international health system.' In a joint statement, Kennedy and Lugones emphasized a vision for a model grounded in 'scientific integrity, transparency, sovereignty, and accountability.' They pointed to the WHO's shortcomings during the COVID-19 crisis as a catalyst for this ambitious initiative.
This new framework aims to prioritize national sovereignty while fostering global cooperation on health issues without the bureaucratic constraints both countries associate with the WHO. While specific details of the proposed system remain under wraps, the leaders expressed optimism about building a modern health collaboration model that could serve as a blueprint for other nations disillusioned with current international structures.
Kennedy's visit underscored the alignment between the two nations, with posts on social media platform X reflecting public intrigue and support for this bold pivot. The joint declaration has sparked discussions about how such a system might operate and which other countries might join this alternative alliance.
Global Implications and Future Outlook
The withdrawal of two significant nations from the WHO raises questions about the future of global health governance. Critics of the move worry about potential fragmentation in international health responses, especially during pandemics or health emergencies of international concern. However, supporters argue that this could pressure the WHO to reform and address long-standing criticisms regarding its effectiveness and political influences.
For now, the focus remains on how the U.S. and Argentina will shape their proposed health system. Both Kennedy and Lugones have committed to further dialogue with other nations to build a coalition around their vision. As this initiative unfolds, the world watches closely to see if this alternative can deliver on its promises of a more transparent and sovereign approach to global health challenges.